Indian Judiciary Purging Itself
Wednesday, 10th September, 2008
In recent times we have seen that Indian judiciary system has pronounced some good judgments that express the true meaning of democracy. In recent months Indian courts had pronounced some judgments in which some influential and rich persons from the society were punished for their anti-social activities. Nitish Katara murder case and BMW hit-and-run case are the perfect examples of it. It must be learnt that in both of the cases accused persons had tried every kind of means to mend the evidence in favor of themselves. But because of active media and sting operations carried out by some channels, culprits and their associates were exposed. These judgments have shown that everyone is equal for law and no one is great than law. Thus honorable court have set examples for the society by pronouncing some good judgments.
Present developments indicate that now judiciary is set to purge itself from the impurities. First such development is the impeachment process initiated against the Calcutta High Court Judge Soumitra Sen for ”misconduct. In the other development Chief Justice of India KG Balakrishnan has granted permission to Central Bureau of Investigation to question two Punjab High Court judges, Nirmaljeet Kaur and Nirmal Yadav, in a ‘cash-at-door’ scam.
Chief Justice of India KG Balakrishnan had recommended the Centre government to initiate impeachment process against Calcutta High Court Judge Soumitra Sen. A committee of senior judges had found him responsible for misappropriation of around 24 lakh during 1990s. CJI has sought his dismissal as he has brought disrepute to the judiciary with his corrupt practices. CJI had asked him to resign to avoid the impeachment process but he turned down the offer. If Parliament starts the impeachment process then it will a first case of impeachment process against a sitting High Court Judge in the history of India.
In the other case Punjab High Court Judge Nirmaljeet Kaur had found Rs 15 lakh at her doorstep. She had lodges a police complaint. UT Police had arrested Prakash Kumar, assistant of former Additional Advocate General Sanjeev Bansal, as the suspect. Later on Police had registered a case against Bansal and had arrested him under IPC provisions and the Prevention of Corruption Act. During the investigation it came to light that money was actually meant to be delivered at the residence of Judge Nirmal Yadav. CJI had constituted a three-judge committee to investigate the case on the recommendations of Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice Tirath Singh Thakur. In the mean time on the request of Punjab Governor SFR Rodrigues CBI had initiated the investigation process and had sought approval from the CJI to question the accused judges.

